Our research team identified the data points used most frequently in the Funder reports, the KIPI Dashboard, and our regular field research.  These comprise the starting point for the new CDP survey. We subsequently held initial feedback conversations with arts and cultural organizations and grantmakers, which informed the current draft of the streamlined CDP. 

All existing CDP profiles were transformed to the new format and remain available on our online platform. Changes to data fields were made retroactively so that past and current year data profiles can continue to be used for trend reporting. We have saved your CDP data in its original format. If you would like to receive a copy of your data in CSV format, please contact our support center.

We’re counting on it! That is our goal. We invested significant time in gathering user experience knowledge, reactions, questions, and concerns from a wide array of stakeholders to ensure that this streamline will make a real difference to the data entry process. Everyone who has participated in a phone call, focus group, or open comment process provided valuable feedback that was essential to our process. The back-end structural changes we’re making to the survey as part of this streamline will also enable us to pursue the future development of other platform features, such as the ability to upload data from a spreadsheet, to further reduce the data reporting burden. While data entry is unlikely to ever be instantaneous, we are invested in making the process smoother so that arts leaders can spend less time reporting and more time learning from their organizational data.

We recognize that the revenue portion of the survey is one of the most detailed, and will remain so in the streamlined version. This is because the detail provided through these questions is a key component of our research on the cultural sector, our KIPI Dashboard, and the analytics reports available to our users. Detailed tracking of revenue by source is an essential aspect of planning for arts and cultural organizations and this data can help arts leaders understand their own business model and how it compares to their peers, as well as inform planning to keep their organizations sustainable over the long term.

The expense section of the streamlined survey is much reduced, but maintains the three column presentation by functional groupings found in the IRS 990 and GAAP standards: Program, Management and General, and Fundraising (these columns are optional for organizations with annual expenses over $50,000). Understanding how organizations are allocating resources across these three main functions is essential for much of our research, insights, and tools. For example, our Fundraising Report relies on the fundraising expenses figure to assess the return on investment in fundraising across the sector, key metrics in our KIPI Dashboard assess organization performance in relation to its investment in programming, and the breakdown by functional groupings is also a key feature of many of our reports used by grantmakers and cultural organizations alike.

This streamline of the CDP represents a first step towards our goal of allowing users to directly upload data into the Cultural Data Profile. Once our streamlined survey is launched at the end of 2020, exploring the direct upload of data will be among our top organizational priorities for 2021. User financial data is stored in a wide variety of systems and formats, and users have expressed concern about allowing the CDP direct access to accounting and other data collecting systems. For these reasons, we will be starting with a financial data system agnostic spreadsheet upload tool to allow users to upload their data via spreadsheet.

We have reduced the survey by approximately 39 sections and 109 line items. Some of the sections and line items we removed were optional, or were not available for all organizations. It’s difficult to quantify the overall effects this will have on how long users spend completing the CDP because of the many variables involved, including the different versions of the survey completed by different users, and the different types of data that users have access to at their organizations to complete the form. But we are confident that the overall reduction in complexity will save time for the majority of our users. There are a few key changes, such as a drastic reduction in complexity in the expense section and the more straightforward approach to program activity, where we hope users will find significant time savings.